All debates
Total debates: 3,851
if u want adjustments, dm me. (っ◔◡◔)っ 🍔
Use any economic indicator you want. I won't provide a metric for "negative economic effect" because I leave that up to the debater. You can choose your own metric, but you will need to defend why it is a better metric than the ones I will use. Metrics should be used up to the date when this debate is accepted. When I say "so far" I mean up to the time when someone accepts this challenge.
I am of the opinion that the whole philosophy of “when a first-world country makes itself richer, it naturally impoverishes other countries” is a stupid idea. It’s just not true. But of course, I am open to hear your side in a civilized debate…
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
You have to argue that the opponent is a better debater. Why? Because I'm bored and it's April 1st
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
To clear things up, I am for censorship in this case-scenario. Noticed some confusion in the comments.
Formal debate on Mandatory Vaccination. I am Pro on this matter.
No description has been provided
Under the conditions where we are now, the socialism or even better, communism would be the most effective way to solve our global problems
Its impossible for me to lose this debate.
U've to justify the restriction of a debater from debating platform
Hot debates
Nothing here